| Starting Date | Appeal No. | Appellant | Act | Type of Hearing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-01-15 | AP-2012-010 | Powers Industries Limited | Special Import Measures Act | Public Hearing |
| 2013-01-29 | AP-2012-013 | G. Thériault | Customs Act | Public Hearing |
| 2013-02-05 | AP-2012-015 | P.B. Footwear (Canada) Inc. | Customs Act | Public Hearing |
| 2013-02-12 | AP-2012-019 | S. Dunlay | Customs Act | File Hearing |
| 2013-02-13 | AP-2012-025 | Regal Ideas Inc. | Special Import Measures Act | Public Hearing |
| 2013-02-14 | AP-2012-020 | Norstar Windows & Doors Ltd. | Special Import Measures Act | Public Hearing |
| Postponed | AP-2011-003, AP-2011-016 and AP-2011-025 | Abricot International Inc. | Customs Act | Public Hearing |
| Postponed | AP-2009-024 | Transnat Express Inc. | Excise Tax Act | Public Hearing |
| Postponed | AP-2011-014 | De Ronde Tire Supply, Inc. | Customs Act | Public Hearing |
| Postponed | AP-2011-060 | Cycles Lambert Inc. | Customs Act | Public Hearing |
AP-2009-024—Whether a certain diesel fuel qualifies for exemption from tax pursuant to paragraph 23(8)(c) of the Excise Tax Act.
AP-2011-003, AP-2011-016 and AP-2011-025—Whether the goods in issue are entitled to preferential tariff treatment under the North American Free Trade Agreement.
AP-2011-014—Whether the goods in issue are entitled to preferential tariff treatment under the North American Free Trade Agreement.
AP-2011-060—Whether the goods in issue are properly classified under tariff item
No. 9506.91.90 as other articles and equipment for general physical exercise, gymnastics or athletics, as determined by the President of the Canada Border Services Agency, or should be classified under tariff item No. 9506.91.10 as exercise bicycles or, in the alternative, under tariff item No. 8714.99.90 as other parts and accessories of vehicles of heading
Nos. 87.11 to 87.13, and whether the goods in issue are entitled to the benefits of tariff item No. 9948.00.00 as articles for use in automatic data processing machines and units thereof, as claimed by Cycles Lambert Inc.
AP-2012-010—Whether the goods in issue are goods of the same description as the fasteners to which the Tribunal's finding in Inquiry No. NQ-2004-005, as continued in Expiry Review No. RR-2009-001, applies.
AP-2012-013—Whether the good in issue is properly classified under tariff item
No. 8703.90.00 as other motor cars and other motor vehicles principally designed for the transport of persons (other than those of heading No. 87.02), including station wagons and racing cars, as determined by the President of the Canada Border Services Agency, or whether its importation should be exempted from the application of the Customs Act, as claimed by G. Thériault.
AP-2012-015—Whether section 48 of the Customs Act permits the appellant to deduct royalty payments from the price paid or payable for the imported goods in issue, therefore reducing the value for duty of those goods.
AP-2012-019—Whether the knife in issue is properly classified under tariff item
No. 9898.00.00 as a prohibited weapon, as determined by the President of the Canada Border Services Agency.
AP-2012-020—Whether the goods in issue have a powder coat finish which is certified to meet the American Architectural Manufacturers Association AAMA 2603 standard and are therefore excluded from the Tribunal’s findings in Inquiry No. NQ-2008-003.
AP-2012-025—Whether the goods in issue have a powder coat finish which is certified to meet the American Architectural Manufacturers Association AAMA 2603 standard and are therefore excluded from the Tribunal’s findings in Inquiry No. NQ-2008-003.