AP-2011-057R and AP-2011-058R — Whether the goods in issue are entitled to the benefit of tariff item No. 9903.00.00 as articles and materials that enter into the cost of manufacture or repair of, and articles for use in, windmills, as claimed by Marmen Énergie Inc. and Marmen Inc.

AP-2012-034—Whether the goods in issue are entitled to the benefit of tariff item No. 9903.00.00 as articles and materials that enter into the cost of manufacture or repair of, and articles for use in, chassis fitted with engines therefor, cabs therefor, and parts and accessories thereof, other than bumpers and bumper parts, safety seat belts and suspension shock absorbers, as claimed by Federal-Mogul Canada Limited.

AP-2014-018—Whether the jurisdictional requirements of subsection 67(1) of the Customs Act have been fulfilled and, if so, whether the claim for preferential tariff treatment under the North American Free Trade Agreement should be allowed.

AP-2014-021—Whether the Tribunal has the jurisdiction under section 67 of the Customs Act to grant the relief requested by Worldpac Canada concerning various claims for refund filed with the Canada Border Services Agency pursuant to subsection 74(1).

AP-2014-023—Whether the goods in issue are properly classified under tariff item No. 2106.90.94 as other food preparations containing 50% or more by weight of dairy content, over access commitment, as determined by the President of the Canada Border Services Agency, or should be classified under tariff item No. 2106.90.95 as other food preparations containing, in the dry state, over 10% by weight of milk solids but less than 50% by weight of dairy content, as claimed by Dealers Ingredients Inc.

AP-2014-029—Whether the goods in issue are properly classified under tariff item No. 9405.40.90 as other electrical machines and apparatus, not specified or included elsewhere in Chapter 85, as determined by the President of the Canada Border Services Agency, or should be classified under tariff item No. 8543.70.00 as other electric lamps and lighting fittings, as claimed by Liteline Corporation.

EA-2014-002 and EA-2014-003—Whether certain fasteners are goods of the same description as the fasteners to which the Tribunal’s exclusion for drawer handle screws in Expiry Review Nos. RR-2009-001 and RR-2014-001 applies and whether various other fasteners, subject to the Tribunal's orders, are entitled to a refund of duties paid or to receive normal values.